I don't know you, but I do know this: A.C.H. is a skill (like learning any style of hypnosis) requires commitment, practice, and immersion in the training.

But to master the skill of A.C.H, you need coaching, community and curriculum.

You get all of those things with this program.

So… I truly believe if you follow the steps, practice with fellow therapists, participate in the community, and dive deeply into the curriculum, you WILL master T.F.A.C.H very quickly.

But ultimately, you need to make the effort. Are your business and career important enough for you to put in the effort?

If so, why not join now?

I think I covered this by explaining the "learning and doing gap" at the top of this page.

But, if you’re still not convinced this is the best training available for hypnotherapists… here are 6 ways A.C.H. is different from any other "hypnosis" out there:

First, most hypnosis training is based on clunky techniques, scripts, language patterns, NLP mixed in with hypnosis, relaxation, and a lot of focus on the hypnosis part – and you can learn this from every other training school out there. So, if you can learn this from all other training schools, why do so many therapists keep training, getting certification after certification and ultimately have a wall full of qualifications but still get stuck working with even the simplest of client problems? This outdated version of hypnosis has you believe all clients can fit into a technique and that you can ‘mind read’ what your client's true root cause problem is and prepare a script in advance. Whereas all training schools focus 80% time on the hypnosis part, deepening, suggestibility tests, language patterns and relaxation and only 20% (if that) on the therapy, A.C.H. focuses 100% of its time on the therapy (making hypnosis a by-product)

Second, other methods and styles require you to memorise and repeat pages of scripts word-for-word. It feels unnatural. ACH has no scripts, no prep work, no giving homework and audios and no forcing visualisations, regressions, and language patterns onto clients. Thus, you can freestyle with every client, every problem, and it does not require you to keep filling your box with ‘stop smoking techniques’, “The best anxiety method”, etc.

Third, traditional hypnosis requires long lectures, stories, upsells, and the trainer reading from a textbook. Whereas ACH is all action, all demos with no boring lectures, upsells, no scripts and no textbooks. I want you to see ACH in action so you can duplicate it with your clients straight away.

Fourth, most training has you read the script, follow the 5-step technique, with the hopes that your clients can follow along. Again, forcing your clients to follow what you want them to do. Also, most training has you complete the curriculum, then leaves you on your own. ACH gives you lifetime access to the events and the community. You can have your hand held through every step.

Fifth, there’s less pressure on you, the hypnotherapist, to remember all these tools, scripts, language patterns and spend hours upon hours prepping your sessions. This pressure does not work well with therapy. ACH has a casual, fun and insightful approach where you will be doing and saying less, and your clients will do all the work themselves.

Sixth, at the completion of the program, you will realise it is just the beginning. You will have mastered ACH, have your prices set from $1500 -$5000, have a community to practise in and have lifetime access to attend as many of the live events as you wish. Think about it. You get 1 paid client after this training, and you have made all your money back and keep everything for life.

Great question. The fact is, you can go to the success stories page on this website, all of our social media, our YouTube channel and even our student interviews to see the quality and results this program (and all of our programs) has.

But I’d be lying if I said everyone who did the program went on to achieve greatness. They don’t. But are you open to hearing the difference between those who fail and those who succeed wildly?

It’s got nothing to do with the curriculum.

After all, if one person doing the program succeeds massively… and another person fails miserably when given the exact SAME lessons and techniques, whose fault is it? The A.C.H. program or the person doing the program?

If you said it’s "the person doing the program", you’re right. Success in ANYTHING is a do-it-to-yourself program.

I have found the only reason NOT to succeed, as with ACH or even our 100K Coaching Program, is giving up too soon or not even starting.

If you don’t follow through and actually finish what you started, there’s NO program on earth that can help you. Make sense?

And that's why there is a major point of difference that you get with the A.C.H. program that you won’t find in other programs.